Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kolya v Tax Practitioners Board [2012] FCA 215 Citation: Kolya v Tax Practitioners Board [2012] FCA 215
Appeal from: Re Kolya and Tax Practitioners Board [2011] AATA 804
Parties: PETER KOLYA v TAX PRACTITIONERS BOARD AND ANOR
File number: ACD 73 of 2011
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 13 March 2012
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – the fact finding role of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – the adequacy of reasons provided – findings on material questions of fact PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – need to identify a question of law – the jurisdiction of the Court on appeal
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 37, 39, 43, 44 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) Part VIIA, Div 2, s 251K Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 430 Tax Agent Services Act 2009 (Cth) ss 20-5, 20-15, 20-25, 40-5, 90 Tax Agent Services (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 (Cth) Schedule 2, Item 13 Income Tax Regulations 1936 (Cth) reg 156 Federal Court Rules (Cth) O53, r 3 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 33.12
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Saxby Bridge Financial Planning Pty Ltd [2003] FCAFC 244, 33 FCR 290, cited. Birdseye v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2003] FCAFC 232, 76 ALD 321, cited. Brown v Repatriation Commission (1985) 7 FCR 302, considered. Cameron v Commissioner of Taxation [2011] FCA 1378, cited. Caporale v Commissioner of Taxation [2012] FCA 86, cited. Commissioner of Taxation v Osborne (1990) 26 FCR 63, cited. Condell v Commissioner of Taxation [2007] FCAFC 44, [2007] ATC 4404, cited. De Simone v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2009] FCAFC 181, 51 AAR 161, cited. Dean v Australian Postal Corporation [2010] FCA 680, 52 AAR 54, cited. Dodds v Comcare Australia (1993) 31 ALD 690, cited. Goodricke v Comcare [2011] FCA 694, 122 ALD 546, cited. Hughes and Vale Proprietary Limited v State of New South Wales (No 2) (1955) 93 CLR 127, considered. Kenso Marketing (M) SDN BHD v Chief Executive Officer of Customs [2011] FCAFC 26, cited. Kolya and Tax Practitioners Board, Re [2011] AATA 804, affirmed. Kowalski v Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission [2010] FCAFC 10, cited. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30, 206 CLR 323, cited. Pleno v Tax Practitioners Board [2010] FCA 1196, cited. Rana v Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission [2011] FCAFC 80, 55 AAR 300, cited. Repatriation Commission v Cotton [2006] FCA 1523, 93 ALD 118, cited. Secretary, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations v Ergin [2010] FCA 1438, 119 ALD 155, cited. Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services v Verney [2000] FCA 570, 60 ALD 737, cited. Selway v Minister for Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government [2011] FCA 43, 120 ALD 40, cited. Stasos v Tax Agents' Board (1990) 21 ALD 437, cited. Su and Tax Agents' Board (SA), Re (1982) 82 ATC 4284, considered. Sullivan v Department of Transport (1978) 20 ALR 323; 1 ALD 383, considered. Toohey v Tax Agents' Board of Victoria [2007] FCA 431, 171 FCR 291, cited.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate