Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kirby v Centro Properties Limited (No 3) [2012] FCA 221 Citation: Kirby v Centro Properties Limited (No 3) [2012] FCA 221
Parties: RICHARD KIRBY v CENTRO PROPERTIES LIMITED (ACN 078 590 682), CPT MANAGER LIMITED (ACN 054 494 307) and PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS RICHARD KIRBY v CENTRO RETAIL LIMITED (ACN 114 757 783), CENTRO MCS MANAGER LIMITED (ACN 051 908 984), PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS and CENTRO RETAIL AUSTRALIA LIMITED (ACN 149 781 322) NICHOLAS VLACHOS, MONATEX PTY LTD, RAMON FRANCO v CENTRO PROPERTIES LIMITED (ACN 078 590 682), CPT MANAGER LIMITED (ACN 054 494 307), CENTRO RETAIL LIMITED (ACN 114 757 783), CENTRO MCS MANAGER LIMITED (ACN 051 908 984) and CENTRO RETAIL AUSTRALIA LIMITED (ACN 149 781 322) NICHOLAS STOTT v PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS SECURITIES LIMITED NICHOLAS VLACHOS, MONATEX PTY LTD, RAMON FRANCO v PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS
File number(s): VID 326 of 2008 VID 327 of 2008 VID 366 of 2008 VID 1028 of 2010 VID 1041 of 2010
Judge: GORDON J
Date of judgment: 13 March 2012
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 135, 136 167(a), 169 and 192A – reasonable request – for the purpose of determining a question that relates to a previous representation – implied representation which might be relevant for the purposes of the proceedings – representation might be relied on for hearsay purpose – failure or refusal to comply with request – without reasonable cause – general discretion to exclude or limit use of evidence – unfair prejudice – framing of limitation order
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate