Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Adamas v The Honourable Brendan O'Connor (No 2) [2012] FCA 227 Citation: Adamas v The Honourable Brendan O'Connor (No 2) [2012] FCA 227
Parties: ADRIAN ADAMAS v THE HONOURABLE BRENDAN O'CONNOR, COMMONWEALTH MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS AND JUSTICE and IAN JOHNSON, THE COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIVE SERVICES
File number: WAD 407 of 2010
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 15 March 2012
Catchwords: EXTRADITION - application by Indonesia to extradite an Australian male citizen - tried in absentia with no right of a re-trial by Australian standards - Magistrate determined that the applicant was eligible for surrender and issued a warrant under s 19(9) of the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) - Minister determined under s 22(2) of the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) that the applicant should be surrendered to Indonesia - whether the Minister was to have regard to the ICCPR - whether this constituted failure to take into account a relevant consideration - whether the applicant's trial was unjust or oppressive or incompatible with humanitarian considerations - whether the Minister applied the appropriate test - whether this resulted in the Minister taking into account an irrelevant consideration - whether this resulted in the Minister failing to take into account a relevant consideration - whether the Minister's conclusion was unreasonable in the Wednesbury sense - whether there was an extradition objection under s 7 of the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth)
Legislation: Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) ss 22, 23 Human Rights Act 2004 (ACT) s 22(d) Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic) s 25(d) Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code Art 263 Extradition (Republic of Indonesia) Regulations 1994 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Art 14
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate