Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Warrell v Fair Work Australia [2012] FCA 267 Citation: Warrell v Fair Work Australia [2012] FCA 267
Appeal from: Warrell v Bacto Laboratories Pty Ltd [2011] FWAFB 7548
Parties: EDWARD GEORGE WARRELL v FAIR WORK AUSTRALIA and BACTO LABORATORIES PTY LTD
File number: NSD 2200 of 2011
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 22 March 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Fair Work Australia – natural justice and procedural fairness – whether Fair Work Australia breached rules of natural justice in refusing adjournment – whether jurisdictional error – whether writs of certiorari and mandamus available and appropriate
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 394, 400, 604 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 23 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B(1)
Cases cited: Coal & Allied Mining Services Pty Ltd v Lawler (2011) 192 FCR 78 followed Plaintiff S157 of 2002 v The Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476 followed Re Refugee Review Tribunal; ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82 followed Russell v Duke of Norfolk [1949] 1 All ER 109 considered Sullivan v Department of Transport (1978) 20 ALR 323 considered
Date of hearing: 15 March 2012
Place: Sydney
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate