Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SBEG v Secretary, Department of Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 277 Citation: SBEG v Secretary, Department of Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 277
Parties: SBEG v SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP, COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA and MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
File number: SAD 334 of 2011
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 23 March 2012
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – where proposed cross-examination in civil proceeding involved disclosure of basis of ASIO adverse security assessment – where public interest immunity claimed – where disclosure of relevant documents not sought – where information to be adduced oral in form – where knowledge of witness derived from briefing document of Director-General of Security – where proceeding concerns psychiatric harm caused by ongoing immigration detention of applicant – where adverse security assessment cause of ongoing detention – whether oral evidence falls within "class" of documents protected from disclosure by public interest immunity – public interest balancing exercise – Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), s 130. Held: that the public interest immunity claim be upheld and a direction made that the information not be adduced as evidence.
Legislation: Anti-People Smuggling and Other Measures Act 2010 (Cth) Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979 (Cth) s 7 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 130 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 65 Migration Regulations 1994 Sch 2 and Sch 4
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate