Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Professional Administration Service Centres Pty Limited v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2012] FCA 278 Citation: Professional Administration Service Centres Pty Limited v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2012] FCA 278
Parties: PROFESSIONAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CENTRES PTY LIMITED ABN 30 109 055 049 v DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
File number(s): NSD 449 of 2010
Judge: EMMETT J
Date of judgment: 2 March 2012
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 r 5.23
Date of hearing: 2 March 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 6
Solicitor for the applicant: R Luk of Knightsbridge North Lawyers
Counsel for the respondent: J Hmelnitsky
Solicitor for the respondent: Maddocks
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 449 of 2010
BETWEEN: PROFESSIONAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CENTRES PTY LIMITED ABN 30 109 055 049
Applicant
AND: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Respondent
JUDGE: EMMETT J DATE OF ORDER: 2 MARCH 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The proceeding be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the proceeding. 3. Orders 1 and 2 be stayed up to and including 9 March 2012. 4. If, no later than 6 March 2012, the applicant: 4.1 Gives discovery in accordance with rules 20.16 and 20.17 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 of: 4.1.1 Any agreement or retainer for the matters the subject of the invoices set out in Schedule 1 to the interlocutory application filed on 2 November 2011, and all documents which record communications with the providers of those invoices in relation to any such agreement or retainer; 4.1.2 Documents which record communications with the providers of any of the invoices set out in Schedule 1, including, but not limited to, directions or instructions as to the manner in which invoices were to be provided; and 4.1.3 All invoices for the matters the subject of the invoices set out in Schedule 1; 4.2 Pursuant to rule 20.31(3) of the Federal Court Rules 2011, produces for inspection at the offices of Maddocks at Level 21, 123 Pitt Street, Sydney, NSW 2000 the documents called for in the Notice to Produce filed and served on 12 October 2011; and 4.3 Files an affidavit in proper form explaining why the orders of 14 November 2011 have hitherto not been complied with; the applicant be granted leave to apply to the Court on 9 March 2012 for Orders 1 and 2 to be rescinded. 5. No later than 12 noon on 5 March 2012, a copy of these orders be provided to Mr Ian Daley, the director of the applicant, at 29 Baileys Road, Tallai, Queensland. 6. The applicant's notice of motion be stood over to 9 March 2012. 7. The proceeding be listed for directions and interlocutory hearing at 9.30am on Friday, 9 March 2012. 8. The applicant pay the respondent's costs to date of the respondent's motion seeking summary dismissal of the proceeding, including the costs of today. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate