Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Strategic Financial and Project Services Pty Limited v Bank of China [2012] FCA 327 Citation: Strategic Financial and Project Services Pty Limited v Bank of China [2012] FCA 327
Parties: STRATEGIC FINANCIAL AND PROJECT SERVICES PTY LTD ACN 110 336 966 and ENERGREEN WIND SYSTEMS PTY LTD ACN 100 729 842 v BANK OF CHINA LIMITED ARBN 002 979 955 and COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA ACN 123 123 124
File number: NSD 1900 of 2008
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 27 March 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – security for costs – notice to produce – whether bills of costs in detailed form were the subject of legal professional privilege – utility of redacted documents
Cases cited: Carey v Korda (2011) 85 ACSR 331 followed Commissioner of Taxation v Rio Tinto Limited (2006) 151 FCR 341 distinguished Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1 cited Pathway Investments Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Limited [2012] VSC 97 cited Save The Ridge Inc v Commonwealth of Australia [2004] FCA 1289 cited
Date of hearing: 27 March 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 28
Counsel for the Applicants: Ms JK Taylor
Solicitor for the Applicants: Colin Biggers & Paisley
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr BA Coles QC with Mr S Golledge
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Freehills
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate