Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kent and Orlizki, in the matter of the Bankrupt Estate of Milovan Stankovic [2012] FCA 333 Citation: Kent and Orlizki, in the matter of the Bankrupt Estate of Milovan Stankovic [2012] FCA 333
Parties: RODNEY KENT AND TIM ORLIZKI (TRADING AS KENT ATTORNEYS) v TERRY GRANT VAN DER VELDE AND JASON SHANE CRONAN AS TRUSTEES OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF MILOVAN STANKOVIC
File number: NSD 212 of 2011
Judge: EMMETT J
Date of judgment: 16 March 2012
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 102, 104
Date of hearing: 9 and 16 March 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 15
Solicitor for the applicants: T Orlizki of Kent Attorneys
Counsel for the respondents: D Ash
Solicitor for the respondents: Watson and Watson
Counsel for the bankrupt: The bankrupt appeared in person
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 212 of 2011
BETWEEN: RODNEY KENT AND TIM ORLIZKI (TRADING AS KENT ATTORNEYS)
Applicants
AND: TERRY GRANT VAN DER VELDE AND JASON SHANE CRONAN AS TRUSTEES OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF MILOVAN STANKOVIC
Respondents
JUDGE: EMMETT J DATE OF ORDER: 16 MARCH 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Leave be granted for the bankrupt, Milovan Stankovic, to be heard and make submissions in relation to this proceeding. 2. The interlocutory process filed by the bankrupt, Milovan Stankovic, on 15 March 2012, be otherwise dismissed. 3. Pursuant to s 104(2) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), the decision of the respondents dated 7 February 2011 in respect of the proof of debt submitted by the applicants in relation to the bankrupt estate of Milovan Stankovic be varied so as to allow the proof of debt in the amount of $246,677.68 (exclusive of interest). 4. The respondents pay the applicants' costs of this proceeding out of the bankrupt estate of Milovan Stankovic. 5. Liberty be granted to the applicants to apply by 30 March 2012 for any different order as to costs, with any such application to be made returnable on 4 May 2012. 6. The proceeding be otherwise dismissed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate