Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Entirity Business Services Pty Limited v Garsoft Pty Limited (No 3) [2012] FCA 334 Citation: Entirity Business Services Pty Limited v Garsoft Pty Limited (No 3) [2012] FCA 334
Parties: ENTIRITY BUSINESS SERVICES PTY LIMITED v GARSOFT PTY LIMITED, SCION BUSINESS SERVICES PTY LIMITED and ANTHONY GARRARD
File number(s): NSD 1418 of 2008
Judge: EMMETT J
Date of judgment: 2 March 2012
Date of hearing: 2 March 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the applicant: The applicant did not appear
Counsel for the first and second respondents: The first and second respondents did not appear
Counsel for the third respondent: The third respondent appeared in person
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1418 of 2008
BETWEEN: Entirity Business Services Pty limited
Applicant
AND: garsoft pty limited
Respondent
SCION BUSINESS SERVICES PTY LIMITED
Second Respondent
ANTHONY GARRARD Third Respondent
JUDGE: EMMETT J DATE OF ORDER: 2 MARCH 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The proceeding be listed for further directions at 9.30am on Friday, 16 March 2012. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1418 of 2008
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate