Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tivo Inc v Vivo International Corporation Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 336 Citation: Tivo Inc v Vivo International Corporation Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 336
Parties: TIVO INC. and TIVO BRANDS, LLC v VIVO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION PTY LTD (ACN 087 480 171) and FABIO GRASSIA; VIVO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION PTY LTD (ACN 087 480 171); TIVO BRANDS, LLC
File number: VID 25 of 2011
Judge: DODDS-STREETON J
Date of judgment: 3 April 2012
Catchwords: COSTS – Whether former or current Federal Court Rules applicable – Whether applicants/cross-respondent's costs to be paid on indemnity basis pursuant to rejected offer of compromise – Whether second respondent's costs to be paid by applicants/cross-respondent
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) O 23 r 11 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 1.04
Cases cited: Peterson v Merck Sharpe & Dohme (Australia) Pty Ltd (ACN 000 173 508) and Another (No 5) (2010) 87 IPR 234 cited Tivo Inc v Vivo International Corporation Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 252 cited
Date of hearing: 23 March 2012
Date of last submissions: 23 March 2012
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 24
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr D Shavin QC with Mr E Heerey
Solicitor for the Applicants: Davies Collison Cave Law
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr S Rebikoff
Solicitor for the Respondents: Polczynski Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 25 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate