Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lipson v Penrice Soda Products Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 337 Citation: Lipson v Penrice Soda Products Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 337
Parties: ANDREW JOHN LIPSON, CHRISTINE KALOGERINIS and LORI ANNE EDGELL v PENRICE SODA PRODUCTS PTY LTD (ACN 008 206 942)
File number: SAD 347 of 2011
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 3 April 2012
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Date of last submissions: 16 March 2012
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Solicitor for the Prospective Applicants: Moloney & Partners
Solicitor for the Prospective Respondent: Piper Alderman
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 347 of 2011
BETWEEN: ANDREW JOHN LIPSON
First Prospective Applicant
CHRISTINE KALOGERINIS
Second Prospective Applicant
LORI ANNE EDGELL
Third Prospective Applicant
AND: PENRICE SODA PRODUCTS PTY LTD (ACN 008 206 942)
Prospective Respondent
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J DATE OF ORDER: 3 APRIL 2012 WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. There be no order as to costs of the application. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 347 of 2011
BETWEEN: ANDREW JOHN LIPSON
First Prospective Applicant
CHRISTINE KALOGERINIS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate