Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Weeks v Commissioner of Taxation [2012] FCA 342 Citation: Weeks v Commissioner of Taxation [2012] FCA 342
Appeal from: The Taxpayer and Commissioner of Taxation [2011] AATA 499
Parties: CHERYL WEEKS v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
File number: QUD 210 of 2011
Judge: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 4 April 2012
Catchwords: TAXATION – whether a termination payment was a 'genuine redundancy payment' per s 83-175 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) – distinction between when redundancy of position and employee no longer being utilised in a position ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – objection to private ruling of Australian Taxation Office – merits review by Administrative Appeals Tribunal – appeal to Federal Court of Australia per s 44(1) Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – nature of an appeal under s 44(1) Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – need to identify a question of law – consideration of what constitutes a question of law – question of denial of procedural fairness before the Tribunal can constitute a question of law – no relevant question of law if issue not raised before the Tribunal PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – appeal from Administrative Appeals Tribunal – notice of appeal to state precise question or questions of law per Rule 33.12(2)(b) of Federal Court Rules 2011 – failure to identify a question of law – self represented litigant – construing questions of law – deviation from strict requirement to state question of law with precision
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) Public Service Act 1999 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate