Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
UBS AG, Australia Branch v Galileo Japan Funds Management Limited; In the Matter of Galileo Japan Funds Management Limited (Responsible Entity) [2012] FCA 364 Citation: UBS AG, Australia Branch v Galileo Japan Funds Management Limited; In the Matter of Galileo Japan Funds Management Limited (Responsible Entity) [2012] FCA 364
Parties: UBS AG, AUSTRALIA BRANCH (ARBN 088 129 613) v GALILEO JAPAN FUNDS MANAGEMENT LIMITED (ACN 121 567 244); IN THE MATTER OF GALILEO JAPAN FUNDS MANAGEMENT LIMITED AS RESPONSIBLE ENTITY FOR THE GALILEO JAPAN TRUST GALILEO JAPAN FUNDS MANAGEMENT LIMITED (ACN 121 567 244) v UBS AG, AUSTRALIA BRANCH (ARBN 088 129 613); IN THE MATTER OF GALILEO JAPAN FUNDS MANAGEMENT LIMITED AS RESPONSIBLE ENTITY FOR THE GALILEO JAPAN TRUST
File numbers: NSD 2234 of 2011 NSD 149 of 2012
Judge: FOSTER J
Date of judgment: 11 April 2012
Catchwords: DISCOVERY – whether discovery should be ordered in aid of proof of surrounding circumstances claimed to be admissible in proceedings where the central issues involve the interpretation of a Facility Agreement wholly in writing and a claim in estoppel – limited discovery ordered
Legislation: Civil Dispute Resolution Act 2011 (Cth), s 6 and s 11(b) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 459P Federal Court Rules 2011, r 20.11(1), r 20.14, 20.16, 20.17, 20.18
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate