Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Adamas v The Hon Brendan O'Connor (No 3) [2012] FCA 365 Citation: Adamas v The Hon Brendan O'Connor (No 3) [2012] FCA 365
Parties: ADRIAN ADAMAS v THE HON BRENDAN O'CONNOR, COMMONWEALTH MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS AND JUSTICE and IAN JOHNSON, THE COMMISSIONER , DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIVE SERVICES
File number: WAD 407 of 2010
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 12 April 2012
Catchwords: EXTRADITION – application for bail under s 39B (1) and s 39B (1A) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) and ss 19, 21 and 23 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) - whether there existed special or exceptional circumstances – conditions that must be met in order for a grant of bail to be made JURISDICTION - whether the Court has jurisdiction under s 23 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – whether the Court ought to exercise its power to grant bail - whether the relief sought by the applicant precludes his release on bail
Legislation: Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) ss 19, 21, 22, 23 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 19, 21 and 23 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B(1) and s 39B(1A)
Cases cited: Adamas v The Honourable Brendan O'Connor (No 2) [2012] FCA 227 Chan v Minister for Justice and Customs (2001) 108 FCR 65 O'Connor v Zentai (2011) 195 FCR 515 Peniche v Vanstone (1999) 96 FCR 38 United Mexican States v Cabal (2001) 209 CLR 165 Zentai v Honourable Brendon O'Connor [2009] FCA 1597 Zentai v Honourable Brendan O'Connor (No 4) [2010] FCA 1385
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate