Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Taylor v United States of America [2012] FCA 366 Citation: Taylor v United States of America [2012] FCA 366
Parties: JAMES SCOTT TAYLOR v UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MAGISTRATE TERRY DUROUX
File number: QUD 205 of 2012
Judge: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 10 April 2012
Catchwords: EXTRADITION – applicant committed to custody – application for bail pending review of Magistrate's order pursuant to s 21(6)(f)(iv) Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) – principles in United Mexican States v Cabal (2001) 209 CLR 165 – strong family, business and investment connections with Australia – cooperation with US authorities – previous compliance with bail conditions – four year delay between presentation of indictment and commencement of extradition proceedings – substantial surety offered – whether special circumstances – whether risk of flight – whether strong prospects of success of review of Magistrate's decision
Legislation: Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) ss 15(6), 19, 19(9)(a), 21(1)(a), 21(6)(f)(iv)
Cases cited: Barney v United Kingdom [2012] FCA 51 cited Habib v The Kingdom of Belgium [2004] FCA 486 cited Haddad v Lyon [2003] FCA 1623 cited Hermanowski v United States of America (2006) 149 FCR 93 cited Moloney v New Zealand [2005] FCA 245 cited Ngo v United States of America (2009) 177 FCR 411 cited O'Donoghue v Ireland [2009] FCA 394 cited Republic of Poland v Ginter [2009] FCA 262 cited Snedden v Republic of Croatia [2007] FCA 1902 cited United Mexican States v Cabal (2001) 209 CLR 165 apply United States of America v Green (2009) 257 ALR 252 cited United States of America v James Scott Taylor MAG 173218/11(7) cited Zentai v Republic of Hungary [2009] FCA 511 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate