Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
C.A.R.E. Employment & Training Services Pty Ltd v Australian Skills Quality Authority [2012] FCA 367 Citation: C.A.R.E. Employment & Training Services Pty Ltd v Australian Skills Quality Authority [2012] FCA 367
Parties: C.A.R.E. EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING SERVICES PTY LTD (ACN 106 294 080) v AUSTRALIAN SKILLS QUALITY AUTHORITY
File number: VID 276 of 2012
Judge: MIDDLETON J
Date of judgment: 3 April 2012
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – natural justice – supervisory role of the Court
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) National Vocational Education and Training Regulator Act 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223
Date of hearing: 3 April 2012
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 29
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms F McKenzie
Solicitor for the Applicant: Mason Sier Turnbull
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms L De Ferrari
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 276 of 2012
BETWEEN: C.A.R.E. EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING SERVICES PTY LTD (ACN 106 294 080)
Applicant
AND: AUSTRALIAN SKILLS QUALITY AUTHORITY
Respondent
JUDGE: MIDDLETON J DATE OF ORDER: 3 APRIL 2012 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be dismissed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate