Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Quincolli Pty Ltd v Fair Work Ombudsman [2012] FCA 373 Citation: Quincolli Pty Ltd v Fair Work Ombudsman [2012] FCA 373
Appeal from: Application for extension of time: Fair Work Ombudsman v Quincolli Pty Ltd & Anor [2011] FMCA 139
Parties: QUINCOLLI PTY LTD and JUDITH MADGE POTTER v FAIR WORK OMBUDSMAN
File number(s): NSD 147 of 2012
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 12 April 2012
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth)
Cases cited: Australian Postal Corporation v Stephens (No 2) (2011) 207 IR 454; [2011] FCA 992 Fair Work Ombudsman v Quincolli Pty Ltd & Anor [2011] FMCA 139
Date of hearing: 12 April 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 9
Counsel for the Appellants: The Appellant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms C Howell
Solicitor for the Respondent: Fair Work Ombudsman
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 147 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: QUINCOLLI PTY LTD
First Appellant
JUDITH MADGE POTTER
Second Appellant
AND: FAIR WORK OMBUDSMAN
Respondent
JUDGE: JAGOT J DATE OF ORDER: 12 APRIL 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for extension of time and leave to appeal filed 30 January 2012 be dismissed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate