Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hillam v Ample Source International Ltd [2012] FCA 374 Citation: Hillam v Ample Source International Ltd [2012] FCA 374
Appeal from: Ample Source International Limited v Bonython Metals Group Pty Limited; In the Matter of Bonython Metals Group Pty Limited (No 7) [2012] FCA 137
Parties: JOHN HILLAM and SARABOL TEERANUKUL v AMPLE SOURCE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED (BVICN 1575638) and BONYTHON METALS GROUP PTY LIMITED (ACN 141 257 294)
File number: NSD 379 of 2012
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 13 April 2012
Corrigendum: 18 April 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – winding up order on the ground of oppression previously stayed on conditions pending appeal – preservation of status quo – interlocutory application for the reconstitution of the board of the company and for the sale of a substantial asset of the company pending appeal
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 233
Cases cited: Williams v Minister for the Environment and Heritage (2003) 199 ALR 352 cited
Date of hearing: 11 April 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 28
Counsel for the Appellants: Mr BW Rayment QC with Mr MJ Gollan
Solicitor for the Appellants: Allsop Glover
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr J Giles
Solicitor for the First Respondent: McCullough Robertson Lawyers
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent did not appear
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate