Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Patel v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 376 Citation: Patel v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 376
Appeal from: Patel & Anor v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2011] FMCA 875
Parties: HETALBEN PRAKASHBHAI PATEL and PRAKASHBHAI PATEL v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: WAD 487 of 2011
Judge: SIOPIS J
Date of judgment: 16 April 2012
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for student visa – applicant required to provide evidence that she would undertake an ELICOS course before commencing principal course – whether applicant satisfied condition by providing evidence that she had already undertaken such a course.
Legislation: Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) Sch 5A Pt 5 Div 2 cll 5A404, 5A404(b), 5A404(b)(i), 5A404(d)(iii), 5A404(d)(iv)
Date of hearing: 7 March 2012
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 25
Counsel for the First and Second Appellants: The First Appellant appeared in person.
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr A Gerrard
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 487 of 2011
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: HETALBEN PRAKASHBHAI PATEL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate