Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ladakh Pty Ltd v Quick Fashion Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 389 Citation: Ladakh Pty Ltd v Quick Fashion Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 389
Appeal from: Ladakh Pty Ltd v Quick Fashion Pty Ltd & Anor [2011] FMCA 519
Parties: LADAKH PTY LTD (ACN 079 120 595) v QUICK FASHION PTY LTD (ACN 126 154 890) and FENG JIANG
File number: VID 1021 of 2011
Judge: JESSUP J
Date of judgment: 19 April 2012
Catchwords: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY - Copyright – Original work used as pattern for ladies' dress – Trade competitor's dress placed on market with same pattern – Whether to be inferred competitor copied pattern or authorised copying – Onus of proof. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Costs – Whether error in exercise of discretion.
Cases cited: Interlego AG & Anor v Croner Trading Pty Ltd (1992) 39 FCR 348 Barrett Property Group Pty Ltd v Dennis Family Homes Pty Ltd (2011) 279 ALR 12 Bowen Investments Pty Ltd v Tabcorp Holdings Limited (No 2) [2008] FCAFC 107 Clarendon Homes (Aust) Pty Ltd v Henley Arch Pty Ltd (1999) 46 IPR 309 House v R (1936) 55 CLR 499 IceTV Pty Ltd & Anor v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd (2009) 239 CLR 458 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Pacific Gaming Pty Limited v Aristocrat Leisure Industries Pty Ltd (2001) 116 FCR 448 Ron Englehart Pty Ltd v Enterprise Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd (2010) 88 IPR 622
Date of hearing: 24 February 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate