Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ananda Marga Pracaraka Samgha Ltd v Tomar (No 5) [2012] FCA 390 Citation: Ananda Marga Pracaraka Samgha Ltd v Tomar (No 5) [2012] FCA 390
Parties: ANANDA MARGA PRACARAKA SAMGHA LTD (ACN 003 193 879) & ORS (ACCORDING TO THE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) v SUNIL KUMAR SINGH TOMAR & ORS (ACCORDING TO THE ATTACHED SCHEDULE); SUNIL KUMAR SINGH TOMAR & ORS (ACCORDING TO THE ATTACHED SCHEDULE); ANANDA MARGA PRACARAKA SAMGHA LTD (ACN 003 193 879) & ORS (ACCORDING TO THE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
File number: VID 208 of 2010
Judge: DODDS-STREETON J
Date of judgment: 5 April 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Cross-examination – Defendants sought to cross-examine second plaintiff in relation to proceeds of sale of two company properties – Whether proposed line of cross-examination relates to pleaded claim or otherwise sufficiently notified
Cases cited: Castel Electronics Pty Ltd v Toshiba Singapore Pte Ltd (2011) 192 FCR 445 discussed Gould v Mount Oxide Mines Ltd (in liq) (1916) 22 CLR 490 discussed
Date of hearing: 5 April 2012
Date of publication of reasons: 18 April 2012
Date of last submissions: 5 April 2012
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 30
Counsel for the Plaintiffs/Cross-Defendants: Mr C Gunst QC with Mr M Irving
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate