Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
King v Jetstar Airways Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 413 Citation: King v Jetstar Airways Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 413
Appeal from: King v Jetstar Airways Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 8
Parties: SHEILA KING v JETSTAR AIRWAYS PTY LTD
File number: NSD 165 of 2012
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 24 April 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Appeals – application for order under r 40.51 limiting appellant's costs – relevant principles where application made in appeal proceedings
Legislation: Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) s 24 Federal Court Rules 1979 O 62A Federal Court Rules 2011 r 40.51 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (NSW) r 42.4
Cases cited: Corcoran v Virgin Blue Airlines Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 864 Delta Electricity v Blue Mountains Conservation Society Inc (2010) 176 LGERA 424; [2010] NSWCA 263 Farrell v Royal King's Park Tennis Club (Inc) [2007] WASCA 173 King v Jetstar Airways Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 8 Lukas v Yorke (1983) 50 ALR 228
Date of hearing: 4 April 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 21
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr A Ahmad
Solicitor for the Applicant: DLA Piper
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms K Eastman
Solicitor for the Respondent: Minter Elison
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 165 of 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate