Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Vehicle Monitoring Systems Pty Limited v Sarb Management Group Pty Ltd (trading as Database Consultants Australia) [2012] FCA 420 Citation: Vehicle Monitoring Systems Pty Limited v Sarb Management Group Pty Ltd (trading as Database Consultants Australia) [2012] FCA 420
Parties: VEHICLE MONITORING SYSTEMS PTY LIMITED ACN 107 396 136 v SARB MANAGEMENT GROUP PTY LTD (T/A DATABASE CONSULTANTS AUSTRALIA) ACN 106 549 722
File number(s): NSD 395 of 2011
Judge: YATES J
Date of judgment: 24 April 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – patent infringement suit – validity of claims in dispute – application for adjournment in the course of the trial to adduce additional evidence Held: application refused
Cases cited: Insta Image Pty Ltd v KD Kanopy Australasia Pty Ltd (2008) 78 IPR 20 Stanway Oyster Cylinders Pty Ltd v Marks (1996) 66 FCR 577
Date of hearing: 24 April 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 15
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr R Cobden SC and Mr JS Cooke
Solicitor for the Applicant: Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr NR Murray and Ms K Beattie
Solicitor for the Respondent: Norton Rose Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 395 of 2011
BETWEEN: VEHICLE MONITORING SYSTEMS PTY LIMITED ACN 107 396 136
Applicant
AND: SARB MANAGEMENT GROUP PTY LTD (T/A DATABASE CONSULTANTS AUSTRALIA) ACN 106 549 722
Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate