Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZQIJ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 429 Citation: SZQIJ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 429
Appeal from: SZQIJ & Anor v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship & Anor [2012] FMCA 63
Parties: SZQIJ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 319 of 2012
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 1 May 2012
Catchwords: MIGRATION – dismissal pursuant to r 36.75(1)(a)(i) of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 r 36.75(1)(a)(i)
Date of hearing: 1 May 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 4
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant did not appear
Solicitor for the First Respondent Ms J Reardon of Minter Ellison Lawyers
Counsel for the Second Respondent The Second Respondent did not appear
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 319 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZQIJ
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: ROBERTSON J DATE OF ORDER: 1 MAY 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed pursuant to r 36.75(1)(a) of the Federal Court Rules 2011. 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate