Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Essential Beauty Franchising Pty Ltd v Essential Beauty (Qld) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 440 Citation: Essential Beauty Franchising Pty Ltd v Essential Beauty (Qld) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 440
Parties: ESSENTIAL BEAUTY FRANCHISING PTY LTD ACN 095 561 621 v ESSENTIAL BEAUTY (QLD) PTY LTD ACN 133 264 427 IN ITS OWN RIGHT AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE ESSENTIAL BEAUTY DISCRETIONARY TRUST
File number: SAD 163/2011
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 26 April 2012
Date of hearing: 26 April 2012
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 7
Counsel for the Applicants: C Munt
Solicitor for the Applicants: Donaldson Walsh
Counsel for the Respondents: M Jones
Solicitor for the Respondents: Butler McDermott
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 163/2011
BETWEEN: ESSENTIAL BEAUTY FRANCHISING PTY LTD
First Applicant
ESSENTIAL BEAUTY (SA) PTY LTD
ACN 100 278 091
Second Applicant
Applicant
AND: ESSENTIAL BEAUTY (QLD) PTY LTD
ACN 133 264 427 IN ITS OWN RIGHT AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE ESSENTIAL BEAUTY DISCRETIONARY TRUST
First Respondent
ANN MARIE DONNARUMMA
Second Respondent
ESSENTIAL BODY PTY LTD
ACN 148 135 639
Third Respondent
MARK ANDREW OLIPHANT
Fourth Respondent
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J DATE OF ORDER: 26 APRIL 2012 WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be refused. Note: Entry of Orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate