Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZQIP v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 442 Citation: SZQIP v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 442
Appeal from: SZQIP v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship & Anor [2011] FMCA 962
Parties: SZQIP v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 2353 of 2011
Judge: Reeves J
Date of judgment: 8 March 2012
Date of corrigendum: 27 August 2012
Date of hearing: 8 March 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 7
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant appeared in person
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Ms J Reardon of Minter Ellison Lawyers
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent did not appear
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZQIP v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 442 CORRIGENDUM The following paragraphs in the Reasons for Judgment should be amended as follows: 1. In paragraph 1, insert a dot point. The quote should read: • The applicant has not claimed that she feared harm because the authorities may impute an anti-Government political opinion to her because of her and her husband's assistance to a Falun Gong practitioner. From the applicant's claims and evidence, the essential and significant reason for the harm she fears is that she has committed an offence under Chinese law and may be punished for that. 2. In paragraph 2, delete "appellant" in the first and sixth lines and insert "applicant" in lieu thereof. 3. In paragraph 2, in the fourth line, insert ".." between "punishment." and "The Tribunal". 4. In paragraph 2, in the fourth line, delete "found" and insert "finds" in lieu thereof. 5. In paragraph 2, in the fifth line, insert a comma after "China". 6. Delete paragraph 2 and insert it as the second dot point of the quote in paragraph 1. 7. In paragraph 3, delete "In his judgment, Lloyd-Jones FM held, in summary, first, that" and insert "In summary, Lloyd-Jones FM held that, first," in lieu thereof. 8. In paragraph 5, delete "in ground one which" and insert "in ground 1. That" in lieu thereof. 9. In the last sentence in paragraph 5, delete "For the brief reasons I have just given" and insert "For these brief reasons" in lieu thereof. 10. In paragraph 6, delete "Ground two" and insert "Ground 2" in lieu thereof. 11. In paragraph 6, in the fourth line, make the sentence beginning "As well as being unparticularised" being into a new paragraph. 12. In paragraph 6, delete "Ground three" and insert "Ground 3" in lieu thereof. 13. Renumber paragraphs 3, 4, 5 and 6 to 2, 3, 4 and 5. 14. In paragraph 7, in the fourth line, delete "Ground four" and insert "Ground 4" in lieu thereof. 15. In paragraph 7, in the sixth line, delete "Grounds three and four must also, therefore," and insert "It follows that grounds 3 and 4 must also" in lieu thereof. I certify that the preceding fifteen (15) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Corrigendum to the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Reeves.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate