Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Alfred v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2012] FCA 450 Citation: Alfred v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2012] FCA 450
Parties: GREGORY ALFRED v CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MINING AND ENERGY UNION and JOHN CONSTANTINOU
File number: VID 806 of 2010
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 2 May 2012
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – freedom of association - whether demand made by union official for employees to join a union in contravention of ss 346, 348, and 349 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – whether identity of union official alleged to have made the demand established – application dismissed EVIDENCE – s 45(3)(c) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – cross examination on alleged prior inconsistent statement contained in a document – whether document should be admitted into evidence
Legislation: Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005 (Cth) ss 44, 57 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 45, 140(2) Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 12, 342, 346(a) and (b), 348, 349(1)(a), 361, 570, 793(1)(a), s 793(2) Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 (Cth)
Cases cited: Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Liquor, Hospitality and Miscellaneous Union v Arnotts Biscuits Limited [2010] FCA 770 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2008] FCA 678 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Abbott (No 2) [2011] FCA 308
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate