Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
MG Corrosion Consultants Pty Ltd v Gilmour [2012] FCA 461 Citation: MG Corrosion Consultants Pty Ltd v Gilmour [2012] FCA 461
Parties: MG CORROSION CONSULTANTS PTY LTD ACN 084 715 177 v MALCOLM STEWART GILMOUR and MAGIL NOMINEES PTY LTD ACN 009 059 607; MALCOLM STEWART GILMOUR and MAGIL NOMINEES PTY LTD ACN 009 059 607; MG CORROSION CONSULTANTS PTY LTD ACN 084 715 177 and ALBERTO CESARIO VINCIGUERRA
File number: WAD 256 of 2010
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 4 May 2012
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – cross-claim be struck out – reasonable prospects of success – restitutionary claim – benefit – unjust enrichment – derivative proceedings – leave to defend a cross-claim – cross-claim wholly defensive
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 236, s 237, s 237(2), Pt 2F.1A Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A
Cases cited: Goozee v Graphic World Group Holdings Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 640; (2002) 42 ACSR 534 Jeans v Deangrove Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 84 Kazar, in the matter of Frontier Architects Pty Limited (in liq) [2010] FCA 1381 Lumbers v W Cook Builders Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2008] HCA 27; (2008) 232 CLR 635 Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul [1987] HCA 5; (1987) 162 CLR 221 RTP Holdings Pty Ltd v Roberts (2000) 36 ACSR 170 Spencer v Commonwealth of Australia [2010] HCA 28; (2010) 241 CLR 118
Date of hearing: 30 May 2011
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate