Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Insurance Australia Limited v Crisp [2012] FCA 469 Citation: Insurance Australia Limited v Crisp [2012] FCA 469
Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Crisp, in the matter of ACN 069 895 585 Pty Ltd (in liq) v ACN 069 859 585 Pty Ltd (in liq) [2012] FCA 148
Parties: INSURANCE AUSTRALIA LIMITED v GLENN ANTHONY CRISP
File number: VID 245 of 2012
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 27 April 2012
Catchwords: APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – application for leave to appeal interlocutory judgment – s 24(1A) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – legal professional privilege – application by liquidator for legal costs incurred in course of liquidation – interlocutory decision that documents relevant to legal costs incurred, are privileged – whether decision is open to dispute – whether substantial injustice – leave to appeal granted.
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 511 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24(1A)
Cases cited: Décor Corporation Pty Ltd and Anor v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Commissioner of Taxation v Rio Tinto Limited (2006) 151 FCR 341 BHP Billiton Petroleum (Bass Strait) Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Resources Pty Ltd [2007] VSC 281 Esso Australia Resources Pty Ltd v BHP Billiton Petroleum (Bass Strait) Pty Ltd [2007] VSCA 224 Daniels Corporation International v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2002) 213 CLR 543 Ace Insurance Ltd v Trifunovski [2012] FCA 235
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate