Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mesoblast, Inc v UCP Gen Pharma AG [2012] FCA 509 Citation: Mesoblast, Inc v UCP Gen Pharma AG [2012] FCA 509
Parties: MESOBLAST, INC v UCP GEN PHARMA AG
File number(s): VID 295 of 2012
Judge: MIDDLETON J
Date of judgment: 15 May 2012
Legislation: Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth)
Cases cited: Austin, Nichols & Co Inc v Lodestar Anstalt [2012] FCAFC 8 Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 UCP Gen Pharma AG v Mesoblast, Inc [2012] FCA 210
Date of hearing: 15 May 2012
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 19
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr C Golvan SC with Mr T Cordiner
Solicitor for the Applicant: Middletons
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr S Burley SC with Ms S Ryan
Solicitor for the Respondent: Davies Collison Cave Law Pty Ltd
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 295 of 2012
BETWEEN: MESOBLAST, INC
Applicant
AND: UCP GEN PHARMA AG
Respondent
JUDGE: MIDDLETON J DATE OF ORDER: 15 MAY 2012 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for leave to appeal be refused. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of, and in connection with, the application. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 295 of 2012
BETWEEN: MESOBLAST, INC
Applicant
AND: UCP GEN PHARMA AG
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate