Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZQKE v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 514 Citation: SZQKE v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 514
Appeal from: SZQKE v Minister for Immigration & Anor (No 3) [2011] FMCA 878
Parties: SZQKE v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and KERRY ANNE-HARTMAN IN HER CAPACITY AS INDEPENDENT MERITS REVIEWER
File number: NSD 2253 of 2011
Judge: COWDROY J
Date of judgment: 18 May 2012
Catchwords: MIGRATION – independent merits reviewer decides appellant not entitled to refugee protection – reviewer finds appellant not exposed to risk of persecution during return journey if deported – Federal Magistrates Court upholds the decision – appellant appeals – whether appellant will be persecuted during return journey to the appellant's home province – independent country information indicating no real risk of persecution in travelling to place of origin – appeal dismissed.
Legislation: Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees 1951 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 36
Cases cited: Alphonsus v The Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 289 Fadil Dyli v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2000] IMM AR 652 Karanakaran v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] 3 All ER 449 M61/2010E v Commonwealth of Australia (2010) 243 CLR 319 Ponnudurai v Minister for Immigration [2000] FCA 91 Randhawa v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 124 ALR 265 R v Secretary of State for the Home Department; ex parte Gunes [1991] Imm AR 278 SZQKE v Minister for Immigration & Anor (No 2) [2011] FMCA 847 SZQKE v Minister for Immigration (No 3) [2011] FMCA 878
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate