Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZQQL v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 518 Citation: SZQQL v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 518
Appeal from: SZQQL v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FMCA 138
Parties: SZQQL v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 433 of 2012
Judges: BUCHANAN J
Date of judgment: 16 May 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – no appearance by the appellant – appeal dismissed pursuant to r 36.75(1)(a)(i) COSTS – lump sum order for costs
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011
Date of hearing: 16 May 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 5
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant did not appear.
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Clayton Utz
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: The second respondent submitted save as to costs.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 433 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZQQL
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: BUCHANAN J DATE OF ORDER: 16 MAY 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal is dismissed for lack of attendance by the appellant. 2. The appellant is to pay the first respondent's costs assessed overall at $2,000. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate