Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dodd v State of South Australia [2012] FCA 519 Citation: Dodd v State of South Australia [2012] FCA 519
Parties: REGINALD DODD, LAURIE STUART (DECEASED) and MILLIE WARREN v THE STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA, COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA, SOUTH AUSTRALIAN NATIVE TITLE SERVICES INC, KUYANI PEOPLE, DIERI PEOPLE, AUSTRALIAN WILDLIFE CONSERVANCY, TONY BOYD, ANDREW TREVOR CLARKE, MACUMBA PASTORAL COMPANY PTY LTD, MULOORINA STATION, STRANGWAYS SPRINGS PTY LTD, BLANUSA OPALS PTY LTD, LAURA HOLDINGS PTY LTD, ALFONZ NAGYSZOLLOSI, MARY M NAGYSZOLLOSI, OZ MINERALS PROMINENT HILL OPERATIONS PTY LTD, SCORPION EXPLORATION PTY LTD, TASMAN RESOURCES LTD, BHP BILLITON OLYMPIC DAM CORPORATION PTY LTD, TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED, TERMITE RESOURCES N.L. and SOUTH AUSTRALIAN APIARISTS ASSOCIATION INC
File number: SAD 6025 of 1998
Judge: FINN J
Date of judgment: 22 May 2012
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE - Consent Determination - requirements under s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) s 47A, s 47B, s 87, s 223, s 225, Part 2, Division 3 Aboriginal Heritage Act 1988 (SA)
Cases cited: King v South Australia (2011) 285 ALR 454 cited Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria (2002) 214 CLR 422 cited Risk v Northern Territory [2006] FCA 404 cited De Rose v State of South Australia (No 2) (2005) 145 FCR 290 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate