Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Stankovic v The Hills Shire Council (No 2) [2012] FCA 522 Citation: Stankovic v The Hills Shire Council (No 2) [2012] FCA 522
Parties: MICHAEL STANKOVIC v THE HILLS SHIRE COUNCIL, TERRY GRANT VAN DER VELDE and JASON SHANE CRONAN
File number: NSD 690 of 2011
Judge: EMMETT J
Date of judgment: 4 May 2012
Date of hearing: 4 May 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 4
Counsel for the applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the first respondent: M Condon
Solicitor for the first respondent: M Pearce of The Hills Shire Council
Counsel for the second and third respondents: D Ash
Solicitor for the second and third respondents: Watson & Watson
Solicitor for Kent Attorneys: T Orlizki of Kent Attorneys
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 690 of 2011
BETWEEN: MICHAEL STANKOVIC
Applicant
AND: THE HILLS SHIRE COUNCIL
First Respondent
TERRY GRANT VAN DER VELDE
Second Respondent
JASON SHANE CRONAN
Third Respondent
JUDGE: EMMETT J DATE OF ORDER: 4 MAY 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant's application for leave to amend his application for leave to file and serve out of time be refused. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate