Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Gacic v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 531 Citation: Gacic v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 531
Appeal from: Gacic & Anor v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2011] FMCA 403
Parties: LJILJANA GACIC and BRANISLAV CIRIC v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 929 of 2011
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 25 May 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to adduce further evidence on appeal – s 27 of Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth). Held: the amended transcript of the hearing before the Tribunal be received as further evidence on the appeal. MIGRATION – procedural fairness – appeal from decision of Federal Magistrates Court to dismiss appeal from decision of Migration Review Tribunal ("Tribunal") affirming decision of first respondent to refuse appellants' applications for Business Skills – Established Business (Residence) (Class BH) visas – where second appellant "secondary applicant" pursuant to clause 845.3 of Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) ("Regulations") since initial application – where "primary applicant" required to satisfy "primary criteria" pursuant to clause 845.2 of Regulations – where appellants claim second appellant purported to give evidence relevant to fulfilment of primary criteria – where second appellant interrupted by Tribunal member on basis of status as secondary applicant – where Tribunal found second appellant did not satisfy primary criteria – whether failure to comply with s 360 of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether jurisdictional error. Held: The appeal must be dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate