Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
The Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia v Traviati [2012] FCA 546 Citation: The Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia v Traviati [2012] FCA 546
Appeal from: [2011] AATA 478
Parties: THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA v MARIO TRAVIATI
File number(s): VID 842 of 2011
Judge: MIDDLETON J
Date of judgment: 1 June 2012
Catchwords: INCOME TAX – penalty imposed in relevant tax income years under s 226G of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) – whether tax shortfall caused by failure of the taxpayer or his or her registered tax agent to take reasonable care – statutory construction of ss 226G and 226K – whether if a taxpayer adopts a reasonably arguable position for the purposes of s 226K they should be accepted as having taken reasonable care. INCOME TAX – penalty imposed in relevant tax income years under s 226G of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) – whether additional penalty tax should be remitted in whole or in part under s 227(3) – factors relevant to the exercise of the discretion in s 227(3) – whether the penalty would be harsh having regard to the particular circumstances of the taxpayer – that the taxpayer's position conformed with a decision of a Federal Court judge was irrelevant – relevance of the imposition of the general interest charge under Pt IIA, Div 1 of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth). ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – whether error of law by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal in construction of ss 226G and 226K of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) – whether error of law by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal in exercise of the discretion in s 227(3).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate