Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hannaford (an examiner under section 46B of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002) v HH (No 2) [2012] FCA 560 Citation: Hannaford (an examiner under section 46B of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002) v HH (No 2) [2012] FCA 560
Parties: JOHN PLANTA HANNAFORD, AN EXAMINER APPOINTED UNDER SECTION 46B OF THE AUSTRALIAN CRIME COMMISSION ACT 2002 v HH
File number: VID 869 of 2010
Judge: DODDS-STREETON J
Date of judgment: 30 May 2012
Catchwords: CONTEMPT OF COURT – Sentencing for contempt – respondent to be finally sentenced after indefinite sentence - contempt of Australian Crime Commission – sentencing range or starting point for term of imprisonment – relevant objectives and sentencing guidelines - respondent refused to answer questions of examiner – whether Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) applies to contempt of the Australian Crime Commission – factors relevant to sentencing
Legislation: Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Corruption and Crime Commission Act 2003 (WA) Explanatory Memorandum Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Bill (No 2) 2009 (Cth)
Cases cited: Allbeury v Corruption and Crime Commission [2012] WASCA 84 affirming Boulton v R (Unreported, Supreme Court of Queensland, Boddice J, 23 June 2011) distinguished Corruption and Crime Commission v Allbeury (No 2) [2011] WASC 26 applied Hannaford (an examiner under the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002) v HH [2010] FCA 1214 cited Kennedy v Lovell [2002] WASCA 226 discussed Mercanti v The Queen [2011] WASCA 120 considered Pattison (Trustee), in the matter of Bell (Bankrupt) v Bell [2007] FCA 137 approved R v Abell [2007] QCA 448 cited R v Drever [2010] SASCFC 27 cited R v Hood [2007] NSWDC 157 distinguished Re Colina; Ex parte Torney (1999) 200 CLR 386 discussed Registrar of the Court of Appeal v Maniam (No 2) (1992) 26 NSWLR 309 discussed Sage v K (Unreported, Supreme Court of Queensland, Mullins J, 28 September 2011) distinguished Vaysman v Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc (2011) 276 ALR 596 discussed Wood v Galea (1997) 92 A Crim R 287 cited Wood v Staunton [No 5] (1996) 86 A Crim R 183 applied
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate