Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
MG Corrosion Consultants Pty Ltd v Gilmour [2012] FCA 568 Citation: MG Corrosion Consultants Pty Ltd v Gilmour [2012] FCA 568
Parties: MG CORROSION CONSULTANTS PTY LTD ACN 084 715 177 v MALCOLM STEWART GILMOUR and MAGIL NOMINEES PTY LTD ACN 009 059 607; MALCOLM STEWART GILMOUR and MAGIL NOMINEES PTY LTD ACN 009 059 607; MG CORROSION CONSULTANTS PTY LTD ACN 084 715 177 and ALBERTO CESARIO VINCIGUERRA
File number: WAD 256 of 2010
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 31 May 2012
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – variation to freezing order
Cases cited: Bird v McComb (No 3) [2011] FCA 697
Date of hearing: 25 May 2012
Date of last submissions: 31 May 2012
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 25
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr D Solomon
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Solomon Brothers
Counsel for the Defendants: Mr K Dundo
Solicitor for the Defendants: Q Legal
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 256 of 2010
BETWEEN: MG CORROSION CONSULTANTS PTY LTD ACN 084 715 177
Plaintiff
MALCOLM STEWART GILMOUR
First Cross-Claimant
MAGIL NOMINEES PTY LTD ACN 009 059 607
Second Cross-Claimant
AND: MALCOLM STEWART GILMOUR
First Defendant
MAGIL NOMINEES PTY LTD ACN 009 059 607
Second Defendant
MG CORROSION CONSULTANTS PTY LTD ACN 084 715 177
First Cross-Respondent
ALBERTO CESARIO VINCIGUERRA
Second Cross-Respondent
JUDGE: BARKER J DATE OF ORDER: 31 MAY 2012 WHERE MADE: PERTH
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate