Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bupa Australia Pty Ltd v iSelect Limited (No 1) [2012] FCA 587 Citation: Bupa Australia Pty Ltd v iSelect Limited (No 1) [2012] FCA 587
Parties: BUPA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 000 057 590) v ISELECT LIMITED (ACN 124 302 932) and ISELECT HEALTH PTY LTD (ACN 088 749 955)
File number: VID 221 of 2012
Judge: DODDS-STREETON J
Date of judgment: 6 June 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Fast Track proceeding - whether categories of documents discoverable – significant probative value adverse to a party's case – principles of discovery
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), ss 18 and 29(1)(g) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 20.14 Private Health Insurance Act 2007 (Cth) Supreme Court Rules 1987 (SA), r 58A.03 Federal Court of Australia, Practice Note CM 8 – Fast Track, Part 7
Cases cited: Channel Seven Adelaide Pty Ltd v Lane & Hurley [2004] SASC 177 Dennis v Chambers Investment Planners Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 63
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Date of last submissions: 22 May 2012
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 52
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr CM Scerri QC with Mr AM Dinelli
Solicitor for the Applicant: King & Wood Mallesons
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr C Golvan SC
Solicitor for the Respondents: Middletons
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 221 of 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate