Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 1) [2012] FCA 589 Citation: Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 1) [2012] FCA 589
Parties: HUA WANG BANK BERHAD v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION BYWATER INVESTMENTS LIMITED v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION CHEMICAL TRUSTEE LIMITED v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION SOUTHGATE INVESTMENT FUNDS LIMITED v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION DERRIN BROTHERS PROPERTIES LIMITED v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
File numbers: NSD 653 of 2011 NSD 652 of 2011 NSD 654 of 2011 NSD 655 of 2011 NSD 656 of 2011
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 6 June 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application to set aside notices to produce – whether notices to produce could be used to compel production of documents relevant to an issue at trial before the trial – whether notices to produce could be used to compel production of documents relevant to an issue at trial at some time that had no nexus with the trial itself
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 r 30.28
Cases cited: Apotex Pty Ltd v Les Laboratoires Servier [2012] FCA 359 cited Suzlon v Bangad (No 2) (2011) 198 FCR 1 cited Tyco Australia Pty Ltd v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd (2005) 142 FCR 428 cited
Date of hearing: 6 June 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate