Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Jutsen (No 5) [2012] FCA 597 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Jutsen (No 5) [2012] FCA 597
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION & CONSUMER COMMISSION v LUALHATI JUTSEN
File number(s): NSD 529 of 2010
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 5 June 2012
Corrigendum: 12 July 2012
Catchwords: CONTEMPT OF COURT – motion for contempt for failure to comply with orders restraining use of bank account – whether respondent knew of content of orders – whether amounts withdrawn reasonably necessary for ordinary living expenses – where no appearance of respondent
Legislation: Federal Court Rules
Cases cited: Australian Securities Commission v Macleod (1993) 40 FCR 155 Jones v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2010) 189 FCR 390; [2010] FCAFC 136 Mead v Mead (2007) 235 ALR 197; [2007] HCA 25 RPS v The Queen (2000) 199 CLR 620; [2000] HCA 3 Witham v Holloway (1995) 183 CLR 525
Date of hearing: 5 June 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 31
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr T Brennan
Solicitor for the Applicant: Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Counsel for the Respondent: The respondent did not appear
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Jutsen (No 5) [2012] FCA 597
CORRIGENDUM
1. This judgment was originally published with the incorrect judgment number: 'Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Jutsen (No 3) [2012] FCA 597'. The citation should be 'Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Jutsen (No 5) [2012] FCA 597'. The cover page has been amended to show the correct judgment number. I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Corrigendum to the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Jagot.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate