Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hyde v ION Limited (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) [2012] FCA 610 Citation: Hyde v ION Limited (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) [2012] FCA 610
Parties: RONALD HENRY HYDE v ION LIMITED (SUBJECT TO DEED OF COMPANY ARRANGEMENT) (ACN 009 106 272) and others named in the attached Schedules
File number: VID 228 of 2012
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 13 June 2012
Catchwords: COSTS – no hearing on the merits – where proceeding dismissed by consent – whether plaintiffs entitled to costs
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43
Cases cited: Ruddock v Vardalis (No 2) (2001) 115 FCR 229 Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622 Akiba and Another v Queensland (2010) 184 FCR 406 Ann Street Mezzanine Pty Ltd v KPMG [2011] FCA 453 Mineralogy Pty Ltd v National Native Title Tribunal & Ors [1998] FCA 1700 Rickus v Motor Trades Association of Australia Superannuation Fund Pty Ltd (2010) 265 ALR 112
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 16
Counsel for the Plaintiffs: Mr R White
Solicitor for the Plaintiffs: Thomas Booler & Co
Counsel for the Defendants: Mr T Clarke
Solicitor for the Defendants: Allens Arthur Robinson
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 228 of 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate