Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kiefel v State of Victoria (Department of Education & Early Childhood Development) [2012] FCA 622 Citation: Kiefel v State of Victoria (Department of Education & Early Childhood Development) [2012] FCA 622
Parties: JAMES KIEFEL v STATE OF VICTORIA (DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION & EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT) JAMES KIEFEL (BY HIS NEXT FRIEND WENDY KIEFEL) v STATE OF VICTORIA
File numbers: VID 2 of 2011 VID 250 of 2011
Judge: GORDON J
Date of judgment: 13 June 2012
Date of publication of reasons: 15 June 2012
Date of hearing: 13 June 2012
Date of last submissions: 13 June 2012
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 38
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr DJ Hancock and Mr PJM Baume
Solicitor for the Applicant: Access Law
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms R Doyle SC and Mr C Young
Solicitor for the Respondent: Allens
Counsel for Ms Phillips: Mr J Fetter
Solicitor for Ms Phillips: MLC Lawyers
Counsel for Mr Kuek: Mr D Perkins
Solicitor for Mr Kuek: Access Law
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 2 of 2011
BETWEEN: JAMES KIEFEL
Applicant
AND: STATE OF VICTORIA (DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION & EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT)
Respondent
JUDGE: GORDON J DATE OF ORDER: 13 JUNE 2012 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The Respondent has leave to inspect and copy the document identified as "E3", dated 12 August 2010 and described as "Email from W Kiefel to J Phillips concerning Mary Gebert". 2. Pursuant to r 24.22 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) the Respondent pay Ms Julie Phillip's reasonable loss or expense incurred by her in complying with the subpoena dated 15 November 2011 addressed to her and served on her by the Respondent (the DEECD), such costs to be taxed in default of agreement. 3. The Respondent pay the Applicant's costs from 30 May 2012 of and in relation to preparation for and attendance at the hearing on 13 June 2012 , such costs to be taxed in default of agreement. 4. The Respondent pay Ms Phillip's costs from 30 May 2012 of and in relation to the preparation for and attendance at the hearing on 13 June 2012, such costs to be taxed in default of agreement. 5. Any application for costs to be taxed pursuant to paragraphs 3 and 4 of these Orders should be considered together. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate