Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Weeden v Rambaldi (No 2) [2012] FCA 647 Citation: Weeden v Rambaldi (No 2) [2012] FCA 647
Parties: PHILIP CHARLES WEEDEN v GESS MICHELE RAMBALDI, ANDREW REGINALD YEO (AS JOINT TRUSTEES OF THE PROPERTY OF PHILIP CHARLES WEEDEN, A BANKRUPT), INSPECTOR-GENERAL IN BANKRUPTCY and OFFICIAL RECEIVER IN BANKRUPTCY ANDREW REGINALD YEO, GESS MICHELE RAMBALDI (AS TRUSTEES OF THE PROPERTIES OF PHILIP CHARLES WEEDEN, A BANKRUPT) v PHILIP CHARLES WEEDEN, INSEPCTOR-GENERAL IN BANKRUPTCY AND OFFICIAL RECEIVER IN BANKRUPTCY
File number(s): VID 744 of 2011 VID 859 of 2011
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 21 June 2012
Catchwords: COSTS – s 43 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – whether unsuccessful party should pay the costs of submissions made by public official in furtherance of official responsibilities.
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1996 (Cth) ss 11(2)(a), 306 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43
Cases cited: Weeden v Rambaldi [2012] FCA 552 Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) (2001) 115 FCR 229
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate