Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Raymond v Northern Territory of Australia [2012] FCA 667 Citation: Raymond v Northern Territory of Australia [2012] FCA 667
Parties: POMPEY RAYMOND (ON BEHALF OF THE WARRANANGKU GROUP, THE KARRANJINI GROUP AND LIJA/MUWARTPI GROUP) v NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA, YARABALA PTY LTD (ACN 001 832 944) and TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED (ABN 33 051 775 556)
File number(s): NTD 20 of 2010
Judge: LANDER J
Date of judgment: 27 June 2012
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – determination of native title by consent – requirements under s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
Cases cited: Cox on behalf of the Yungngora People v State of Western Australia [2007] FCA 588 Jungarrayi on behalf of the Mirtartu, Warupunju, Arrawajin and Tijampara Landholding Groups v Northern Territory of Australia [2011] FCA 766 Lovett on behalf of the Gunditjmara People v State of Victoria [2007] FCA 474 Munn (on behalf of the Gunggari People) v Queensland (2001) 115 FCR 109 Roberts on behalf of the Najig and the Guyanggan Nganwirdbird Groups v Northern Territory of Australia [2012] FCA 223 Wavehill v Northern Territory of Australia [2011] FCA 581
Date of hearing: 27 June 2012
Place: Historic Newcastle Waters Township
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate