Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Thompson v Kane [2012] FCA 674 Citation: Thompson v Kane [2012] FCA 674
Parties: PETER JAMES THOMPSON v TERESA KANE and FEDERAL MAGISTRATE SPELLEKEN
File number(s): QUD 206 of 2012
Judge: GREENWOOD J
Date of judgment: 8 MAY 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – consideration of an interlocutory application for an order staying the operation of final orders of the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia in circumstances where an order of that Court already operates as a stay of those orders pending the determination of appeals from the final orders of that Court
Date of hearing: 8 May 2012
Date of last submissions: 8 May 2012
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 10
Person assisting the Applicant: Mr Bell
Counsel for the Respondents: Ms E Ford
Solicitor for the Respondents: Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 206 of 2012
BETWEEN: PETER JAMES THOMPSON
Applicant
AND: TERESA KANE
First Respondent
FEDERAL MAGISTRATE SPELLEKEN
Second Respondent
JUDGE: GREENWOOD J DATE OF ORDER: 8 MAY 2012 WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The interlocutory application is dismissed with costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 206 of 2012
BETWEEN: PETER JAMES THOMPSON
Applicant
AND: TERESA KANE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate