Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Charan v Gleeson [2012] FCA 675 Citation: Charan v Gleeson [2012] FCA 675
Parties: USHA WATI CHARAN v BRUCE GLEESON
File number: NSD 821 of 2012
Judge: NICHOLAS J
Date of judgment: 19 June 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether to make an order staying a sequestration order pending determination of the appeal
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 52(3)
Cases cited: Bourke v Westpac Banking Corporation [2012] FCA 6 Charan v Gleeson [2010] FMCA 703 Davidova v Murphy [2009] FCA 601 Liprini v Liprini (No 2) [2011] FCA 1150 Re Schmidt; ex parte Anglewood Pty Ltd (1968) 13 FLR 111 Rigg v Baker (2006) 155 FCR 531 Totev v Sfar (2006) 230 ALR 236
Date of hearing: 19 June 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 14
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: J O'Connor
Solicitor for the Respondent: Gillis Delaney
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 821 of 2012
BETWEEN: USHA WATI CHARAN
Applicant
AND: BRUCE GLEESON
Respondent
JUDGE: NICHOLAS J DATE OF ORDER: 19 June 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The interlocutory application filed 13 June 2012 be dismissed. 2. The respondent's costs of the interlocutory application are to be taxed and paid out of the estate of Usha Wati Charan. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate