Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Reeve v Aqualast Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 679 Citation: Reeve v Aqualast Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 679
Parties: LLOYD REEVE v AQUALAST PTY LTD (ACN 137 316 888), ULTRALAST MANUFACTURING PTY LTD (ACN 139 587 242), ULTRALAST INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD (ACN 137 334 706), ULTRALAST HOLDINGS PTY LTD (ACN 146 101 386), GREENGUARD PTY LTD (147 950 098), ALPHALAST PTY LTD (ACN 140 791 644), ALPHALAST GLOBAL PTY LTD (ACN 152 564 200), ECO GLOBALGEN PTY LTD (ACN 152 594 628), MAHER (AKA MARK) JOSEPH, AKA JOSEPH MAHER and STEVEN NIKOLOVSKI
File number: NSD 98 of 2012
Judge: YATES J
Date of judgment: 29 June 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for preliminary discovery under r 7.23 of the Federal Court Rules 2011
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 rr 7.21, 7.23
Cases cited: Ebos Group Pty Ltd v Team Medical Supplies Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 862 EBOS Group Pty Ltd v Team Medical Supplies Pty Ltd (No 3) (2012) 199 FCR 533 Glencore International AG v Selwyn Mines Ltd (recs and mgrs apptd) (2005) 223 ALR 238 Higgins v Hancock (2011) 199 FCR 393 St George Bank Ltd v Rabo Australia Ltd [2004] FCA 1360
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate