Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
C2C Investments Pty Ltd, in the matter of C2C Investments Pty Ltd v Leigh (No 3) [2012] FCA 680 Citation: C2C Investments Pty Ltd, in the matter of C2C Investments Pty Ltd v Leigh (No 3) [2012] FCA 680
Parties: C2C INVESTMENTS PTY LTD (ACN 102 331 840) and GEOFFREY ANTHONY SHANNON v DAVID JOHN LEIGH TRADING AS PPB (NORTHERN NSW) (A FIRM) and REGISTRAR GENERAL OF NEW SOUTH WALES
File number: NSD 454 of 2010
Judge: YATES J
Date of judgment: 29 June 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application under rr 6.01 and 29.03 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 to strike out paragraphs of affidavit – whether paragraphs contain matter that is scandalous, irrelevant or otherwise oppressive
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 rr 6.01, 29.03
Cases cited: C2C Investments Pty Ltd, in the matter of C2C Investments Pty Ltd v Leigh (No 2) [2011] FCA 501 Kowalski v Mitsubishi Motors Australia Ltd [2009] FCA 1289 Millington v Loring (1880) 6 QBD 190 Shannon v Smith (1914) 1 SR (NSW) 253 Wu v Avin Operations Pty Ltd (No 2) [2006] FCA 792
Date of hearing: 12 March 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 40
Counsel for the Plaintiffs: Mr MS Jacobs QC
Solicitor for the Plaintiffs: GWM Lawyers
Counsel for the Defendants: Mr P Walsh
Solicitor for the Defendants: Church & Grace
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 454 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate