Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kelly v Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2012] FCA 689 Citation: Kelly v Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2012] FCA 689
Parties: SEAN KELLY v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
File number: QUD 571 of 2010
Judges: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 29 June 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application by applicant for court to review its reasons and conclusions – where final orders not yet made – application by applicant for court to revoke leave for respondent to claim superannuation deduction not allowable deduction – costs – rule 17.01(3) of Federal Court Rules 2011. Held: the applicant's applications must be refused. TAXATION – superannuation deduction – where applicant a director of trustee company of applicant's family trust – where applicant received superannuation benefit from trustee company – whether payment allowable deduction for purposes of s 290-60 of Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) – whether applicant an employee for purposes of s 12(2) Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 (Cth) – whether payment evidence of "entitlement to payment" – whether applicant entitled to quantum meruit for services to trustee company – where constitution of trustee company provided for remuneration of directors by way of resolution of company in general meeting. Held: The superannuation deduction was not an allowable deduction for the purposes of s 290-60 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth).
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 140, 202A Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) ss 2, 65, 290-60, Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 (Cth) s 12
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate